Insurance that burns almost every week and still pays back 2.95 for every dollar
Most weeks this insurance simply burns. In calm weeks the puts expired worthless about eight times out of nine. Over two years of ETH data they still paid back 2.95 for every dollar spent, because the rare weeks when they paid were the weeks ETH fell apart.
This study is behind the insurance in our Pendulum strategy and behind the puts in our public ETH plan. Below are the question, the method, what worked, what didn't, and where the numbers can mislead you. The exact rules, the tables and this week's example are in the full version.
The question
Selling options brings in a small, steady premium on most days and gives a lot of it back in a crash. That's how our Pendulum earns, and that's where it bleeds. So the first question was simple: can cheap puts far below the price stop the bleeding without eating all the premium?
The second question came later, once the first numbers looked better than we expected: do those puts make money on their own, with nothing to insure?
How we tested it
Two years of Deribit data on BTC and ETH. Option prices were rebuilt hour by hour from the exchange's real volatility index (DVOL), then every trade paid the spread we measured on actual quotes plus Deribit's fee. A new put every week, held to expiry.
Entries were spread across four points of the week so no single lucky day decides the result. After a week when the put paid, the next week is skipped: crashes come in clusters, and a second put in a row is bought at the price of fear. About 21 separate experiments in two rounds, each with its code and report.
As insurance: it works
On the option-selling strategy, far puts cut the deepest drawdown from 23% to 15% on BTC and from 30% to 18% on ETH. And the insurance paid for itself: net of its cost, the insured strategy finished the crash cycle $1,890 (BTC) and $3,887 (ETH) better off. Calls as insurance against a sharp rise added nothing useful, crypto's upside tail is too thin to pay for.
Live paper trading at real prices since 11 May shows the same thing. The Pendulum without insurance has slipped from $50,000 to $47,256. The three insured versions sit at $50,585, $54,011 and $59,491 (data as of 25 September 2026). So what separates the red line from the green ones is the insurance that loses money in most weeks.
- On its own: ETH yes, bitcoin barely
- The exact rule we trade: instrument, delta, time to expiry, the calm threshold and the size in deep calm, the skip rule after a payout.
- Why calm matters
- What didn't work
- The full tables: delta × time to expiry for BTC and ETH, the effect of the calm threshold at each delta, and two working configurations with yearly return and drawdown depth.
- How we apply it right now: this week's example with real strikes and prices, what to do after a deep drawdown, and one hint we deliberately left out of the rule.
What this study can't tell you
- Two years and effectively one market regime. A single crash makes up 40-47% of the whole payout (44% on the ETH calm rule).
- Prices are rebuilt from the volatility index with a measured spread, not from real trades. A month of real buys at the ask in May and June 2026: all six puts burned. A small sample, but a reminder that the dry spell is real.
- Only 11% of calm weeks paid out: long losing streaks are normal here, not a malfunction.
- The live Pendulum curve is paper trading since 11 May, four versions side by side; the best of them is the best of four.
Got an options question of your own?
This study started as one plain question. We run the same pipeline on request: your idea, tested on years of Deribit data, with a verdict. A negative verdict is an answer too.
Order a studyRead next
- The Pendulum: four versions, updated daily
- When crypto options are cheapest: weekend volatility
- Plans and research on request
Not investment advice. The study describes past data and paper trading; options can lose their entire value.